DSpace Repository

Modified STOPP-START criteria for Sri Lanka’; translating to a resource limited healthcare setting by Delphi consensus

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Samaranayake, N. R.
dc.contributor.author Balasuriya, A.
dc.contributor.author Fernando, G. H.
dc.contributor.author Samaraweera, D.
dc.contributor.author Shanika, L. G. T.
dc.contributor.author Wanigasuriya, J. K. P.
dc.contributor.author Wijekoon, C. N.
dc.contributor.author Wanigatunge, C.A.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-10T06:47:50Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-10T06:47:50Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation Samaranayake, N. R., et al. (2019). Modified STOPP-START criteria for Sri Lanka’; translating to a resource limited healthcare setting by Delphi consensus. BMC Geriatrics, (2019) 19:282 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dr.lib.sjp.ac.lk/handle/123456789/11585
dc.description.abstract Background: ‘Screening tool of older people’s prescriptions (STOPP) and screening tool to alert to right treatment (START)’ criteria is a useful tool to assess the appropriateness of medicines among older adults. However, the original STOPP/START criteria developed in the West, may not be directly applicable to resource limited healthcare settings like Sri Lanka. Hence, we aimed to modify STOPP/START criteria (Version 2) to suit Sri Lanka. Method: Two investigators (a clinical pharmacologist and a pharmacist) reviewed and flagged criteria that were unfeasible to Sri Lanka based on their previous research experiences on using STOPP/START version 1. A Delphi consensus methodology was conducted among six experts, including geriatricians, clinical pharmacologists, physicians and a pharmacist, to review and assess each criterion (including the ones flagged by the researchers) for suitability to Sri Lanka. Results: Two Delphi validation rounds were conducted. A final meeting was held with the participation of all experts to resolve disagreements and to establish 100% consensus. The expert panel agreed on a list of 105 criteria, including 70 STOPP and 35 START criteria, indicating an 8% reduction in criteria compared to the original version. Modifications included complete removal (n = 11), re-wording (n = 25), splitting (n = 1) of original criteria and adding a new criterion (n = 1). Main reasons for modifications were unavailability of some medicines in the country, unavailability or inaccessibility of specific clinical information required for assessment of criteria, and adherence to treatment guidelines commonly used in the country. Conclusion: A list of ‘Modified STOPP/START criteria for Sri Lanka’ was developed. These criteria are currently being validated through a multi-centre study. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMC Geriatrics en_US
dc.subject STOPP/START criteria, Delphi validation, Resource limited setting, Older adults, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.title Modified STOPP-START criteria for Sri Lanka’; translating to a resource limited healthcare setting by Delphi consensus en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account