DSpace Repository

QUALITY VS COST OPTIMIZING THE FORMULATION OF EMULSION PAINT

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author N.K., IDIRISINGHE
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-06T08:38:02Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-06T08:38:02Z
dc.date.issued 2016-10-06T08:38:02Z
dc.identifier.uri http://dr.lib.sjp.ac.lk/handle/123456789/3116
dc.description.abstract Attached en_US
dc.description.abstract TheexistingEmulsion paint was studied in detail. (The main aim is to identify the quality levelof the existing Emulsion paint). According to the existing Emulsion paint formulation the high cost centers were identified.The highest cost contribution is coming from Titanium Dioxide and binder. Themain objective of this project is to reduce the raw material cost of the emulsion paint. Hencethe trials were carried out to reduce the Titanium Dioxide and binder level by reformulatingwith a new cost effective raw materials. Trial one was planned to introduce a new opacifying agent called Opaque polymer. Opaquepolymer is non film forming aqueous emulsion polymer which aids to reduce the rawmaterial cost of the emulsion paint. The polymer consists of hollow acrylic styrene beadssupplied in emulsion form. Initially these beads are filled with water. When a paint containingopaque polymer dries, the water permanently diffuses from the core of the particlesand is replaced by air. These encapsulated air voids supplement the hiding effect ofTitaniumDioxide. In standard paint the Titanium Dioxide percentage is 27.5%. The binder percentage is 25%. But in the trial 1 formulation the Titanium Dioxide and binder percentage was reducedto 16.5% and 15%. The quality level of this was tested against standard paint and results show respectively. According to the results new formulation give very much superiorquality than existing paint. Second trial was planned to introduce a new extender called Polstar. Because of its distinct benefits in opacity, whiteness and scrub resistance, the amount of Titanium Dioxidecan be reduced. Here the trial was carried out by using 25% Titanium Dioxide and 25% binder and incorporating 2.5% Polstar. However the results of this were also compared with the standard paint. But the quality level of this was not up to the standard. When compared the trial one and trial two with the standard paint the lowest raw material cost contribute from trial 1 formulation. The highest quality level also can be seen in trial one formulation. So that the main objective of this project is achieved by trial one formulation as it has the lowest cost and highest quality when compared with the standard formulation.
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title QUALITY VS COST OPTIMIZING THE FORMULATION OF EMULSION PAINT en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.date.published 2001-12


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account