| dc.contributor.author | Daneshvar, E | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zarrinmehr, M.J | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kousha, M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vithanage, M | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-26T05:52:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-26T05:52:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Daneshvar, E, et al.(2019)."Hexavalent chromium removal from water by microalgal-based materials: Adsorption, desorption and recovery studies",Bioresource Technology 293 (2019) 122064 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dr.lib.sjp.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9042 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The current study presents a comprehensive comparison towards the potential of different microalgal-based materials for the removal of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) from water. Among the tested materials, microalgal biochar showed the highest removal efficiency (100%) of Cr(VI). The highest monolayer estimated adsorption capacities were 23.98, 25.19 and 24.27 mg/g at 5, 22 and 35 °C, respectively. Experimental data showed good compliance with pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The results of continuous column studies showed that the column removal efficiency increased from 52.33 to 57.58% by increasing the adsorbent dose from 0.125 to 0.200 g. Desorption efficiency of Cr(VI) by 0.1M NaOH was increased from 51.16 to 59.41% by sonication bath as compared to roller shaker. More than 97% of desorbed Cr(VI) was recovered in less than 10 min by BaCl2. This study shows that non-living microalga materials are more effective than living cells in the removal and recovery of Cr(VI) from water. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
| dc.subject | Microalga Hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) Biochar Biosorption Desorption Recovery | en_US |
| dc.title | Hexavalent chromium removal from water by microalgal-based materials: Adsorption, desorption and recovery studies | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122064 | en_US |