| dc.contributor.author | Irshad, M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Keijzer, M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wieling, M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Verspoor, M. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-15T09:24:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-15T09:24:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Irshad, M., et al. (2019). Effectiveness of a dynamic usage based computer assisted language program. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 8:2(2019),pp. 137–162.issn2211-7245 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dr.lib.sjp.ac.lk/handle/123456789/11655 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The current paper explores whether a Dynamic Usage Based (DUB) approach– which takes authentic meaningful language use with repetition and scaffolding for comprehension as its basis– can also be implemented in a CALL environment. The effectiveness of theDUB-CALLprogram was tested in asemester-longexperiment, comparing it with ateacher-fronted DUB program (using the same materials as the CALL program) and a traditional CLT program; 228 university undergraduates in Sri Lanka participated. Language gains were assessed in apre-postdesign with an objective General English Proficiency (GEP) test and a writing task. The results show that the students in theDUB-CALLcondition performed significantly better on the GEP test than the students in the twoteacher-frontedclasses. The results of the writing tests show that all groups improved significantly, but here there were no differences among groups. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics | en_US |
| dc.subject | computer assisted language learning,dynamic usage based approach,L2 instruction,effectiveness study | en_US |
| dc.title | Effectiveness of a dynamic usage based computer assisted language program | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |