Abstract:
Recently Iittle systematic work has been undertaken on the
quality of labour force as a factor in promotion of economic growth in less
developed countries. In addition to measures which encourage acquisition
of more and better skills, nutritional imprcvements of the labour force,
seem to be an important aspect of human capital formation, which are
important prerequisites of economic growth.
Malnutrition and under-nutrition is dominant among the low
income workers in less developed countries. The energy intake of the low
income workers appears to be inadequa~e for 'hundred per cent productivity'.
Several experimental studies done in both developed and less
developed countries d~ring the last four decades, show that increased
calorie intake by under-nourished workers leads to increased productivity.
It is hard to establ ish the relationship between calorie intake
and productivity of labour due to the ability of the human body to adapt
to changes in calorie intake within a certain degree, without affecting
the abil ity to carry out physical activities. But experiments have shown
that a change of about 400 calories a day would affect the abil ity to
carry out physical activities of the worker.
Goverriment expenditure on food s~bsidy in less developed countries,
particularly in Sri Lanka, has been considered a welfare measure; and
often is argued that such expenditure is made at the cost of economic growth.
But nobody has examined the direct benefit of such measures.
According to Blanc (1975) about 30 per cent increase in
productivity can be expected from a moderately active person who increases
his daily calorie intake from 2000 calories to 2500 calories. In Sri Lanka,
x.
per capita calorie intake of manual workers is around 2000 calories a day.
If two measures of rice per week are given to them, their dai ly calorie
intake wi! I increase by about 900 calories. Hence, minimum of 30 per cent
increase in productivity can be expected from the consumption of additional
rice.
It appears that the value of the expected incremental output
resulting from increase in productivity of manual workeYs alone is
sufficient to cover the cost of this ration of rice to everyone in the
community.
Therefore, it seems the problem of 'free rice' in Sri Lanka
is a problem of managing the economy efficiently in such a way as to be
able to real ise productivity increases made possible by increased consumption
