Abstract:
ABSTRACT
Given the general primacy of the gendered/sexed subject that even seems to demarcate the human from the
non-human, one’s gendered/sexed identity gains an originary significance over other identity categorizations
such as race, class, ethnicity etc. Gender/sex seen as an effect of a mainstream patriarchal ideology of
heterosexuality, further assumes and validates/naturalizes a gendered/sexed corporeality (an assumed
“reality”). Such a discourse then makes available a “woman’s body” by giving primacy/recognition to
heterosexual difference, on the basis of which discrimination and exploitation are enacted.
What I aim here is to problematize this heterogendered/sexed (gender is always already heterogendered)
binary (not to say that sexuality or sexual difference/identity does not matter), by claiming that it is the
assumed primal significance of heterogender/sex that is the mainspring of societal sexism. And it is only
through a disruption of the very moment of discursive recognition/discrimination/interpellation of the
“woman’s body,” that sexist discourses can be subverted. In the above light, the apparent reinforcement of
the heterogendered/sexed binary and “black difference” in selected twentieth-century African American
women’s writing seems at loggerheads with my theoretical problematizations. However, these writings, read
from a particular location, also open up a space of ambivalence; for, though beginning in heterogender/sex,
these texts have the potential to look forward to a future freedom that transcends constraints generated by
the “woman’s body.”
Thus, I will locate my study in selected African American texts by women (for instance, Toni Morrison’s Song
of Solomon, poetry by Nikki Giovanni, Lucille Clifton, etc.) while drawing from poststructural theoretical
sources such as Judith Butler, bell hooks, Monique Wittig and Helene Cixous.
